|
Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE)
Meta-analyses
of human neuroimaging data was for a long time confined to either summaries
of label-based activation or descriptive statistics of activation centers
originating from plotting available activations on a template brain.
However, recent advances in statistical handling of 3D data have allowed
the emergence of new types of meta-analytic techniques. Our group has
experience from using one of these new methods, used to estimate the
likelihood of brain activations across multiple studies, the method
of Activation Likelihood Estimates (ALE; Eickhoff et al., 2009; Laird
et al., 2005; Turkeltaub, Eden, Jones, & Zeffiro, 2002). The
ALE technique has three important advantages over traditional label-based
regional reviews and meta-analyses. First, foci of activation are the
input into the analysis, instead of labels. Labeling of anatomical areas
does not occur until after data pooling, and thus is independent of
differences in labeling among studies. Second, the foci that serve as
the input for the analysis are weighted by the number of participants
in each study. Third, this method yields a quantitative estimate of
the probability of activation, which is statistically analyzed for significance
and corrected for the observation of false positives. Forth, the ALE
algorithm identifies common activations, and thereby factors out effects
not related to the process of interest, such as different methodologies
that are used by different research groups. The
ALE software (GingerALE; http://www.brainmap.org/ale)
does an automated analysis that has been described in detail elsewhere
(Eickhoff et al., 2009; Laird et al., 2005; Turkeltaub et al., 2002)
and we refer the interested reader to the Ginger ALE homepage. Below, we are providing output maps in nii format from three of our recent meta-analyses of intranasal trigeminal stimulation (Albrecht, et al., 2010), gustatory stimulation (Veldhousen, et al., 2011), and olfactory processing (Seubert et al., in press). Please refer to the original papers above for details of how data were gathered, processed, and analyzed. We are below providing ALE maps as final ALE statistical output, saved as a nifti file, in both Talairach and MNI stereotactic space [to download, click on specific link below]. The result file can either be used as an inclusive mask in analyses where only voxels known to process gustatory/trigeminal stimulus should be included [note that a binarized map is needed] or as a tool to view where typical location are located at certain statistical probabilities. If the latter is of interest, we recommend that the ALE result file is loaded as a functional overlay using either MRIcroN or MANGO, both freely available online. To download the Nifti files, right click on the respective link below, then choose Save Target As... Alternatively, you can just click on the link and you will find the nii file in your 'download' folder.
ALE
of Intranasal Trigeminal Stimuli
|
||
|
Albrecht, J.,
Kopietz, R., Frasnelli, J., Wiesmann, M., Hummel, T., & Lundstrom,
J. N. (2010). The neuronal correlates of intranasal trigeminal function-an
ALE meta-analysis of human functional brain imaging data. Brain Res
Rev, 62(2), 183-196. Result Summary
From Abstract:
ALE of Gustatory Stimuli |
||
|
Veldhuizen, M. G.,
Albrecht, J., Zelano, C., Boesveldt, S., Breslin, P., & Lundstrom,
J. N. (2011). Identification of human gustatory cortex by activation likelihood
estimation. Hum Brain Mapp. 32(12), 2256-66. Result Summary
From Abstract: [download ALE result output in Talairach space] [download ALE result output in MNI space]
ALE of Olfactory Stimuli |
||
|
Seubert, J., Freiherr, J., Djordjevic, J., & Lundström, J.N. (in press). Statistical localization of human olfactory cortex. NeuroImage. Result Summary
From Abstract: |
||
|
SPM Masks of Olfactory Cortex |
||
|
Seubert, J., Freiherr, J., Frasnelli, J., Hummel, T., & Lundström, J.N. (in press). Orbitofrontal Cortex and Olfactory Bulb Volume Predict Distinct Aspects of Olfactory Performance in Healthy Subjects. Cerebral Cortex. Result Summary : We assessed the link between the underlying neuroanatomy and olfactory performance by correlating voxel-based morphometry data from 90 healthy adults with olfactory performance measures. Supplementing this approach with region of interest (ROI) analyses of functionally defined olfactory cortical regions and olfactory bulb volume, we sought to disentangle the relative contribution of central and peripheral areas to behavioral variability. Whole-brain analyses revealed a significant positive correlation of gray matter volume and olfactory function scores in the right orbital sulcus. This effect was confirmed by the ROI analyses of piriform and orbitofrontal cortex based on olfacory ALE analyses. These data suggest an important role of regional gray matter volume in the right orbitofrontal cortex and olfactory bulb volume for olfactory performance in healthy individuals. |
||
|
References |
||
|
Seubert, J., Freiherr, J., Djordjevic, J., & Lundström, J.N. (in press). Statistical localization of human olfactory cortex. NeuroImage. Seubert,
J., Freiherr, J., Frasnelli, J., Hummel, T., & Lundström, J.N.
(in
press). Orbitofrontal Cortex and Olfactory Bulb Volume Predict Distinct
Aspects of Olfactory Performance in Healthy Subjects. Cerebral Cortex. |
||